June 5, 2011

Condo Association Settles Discrimination Complaint

When a South Jersey woman fell behind on her maintenance fees and her condominium association responded by revoking her privileges to certain amenities, she filed a discrimination complaint. The condo association is now expected to pay $10,000 in settlement of that complaint. (1)

Mary Lou Frisch was in arrears on her monthly maintenance fees since January of 2007. In November 2008, Mays Landing Village Condominium Association suspended Ms. Frisch’s rights to use certain common areas, including the parking lot - hence the problem. (2)

Ms. Frisch suffers from a debilitating lung disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. When she could no longer use the development’s parking lot, she had to park off premises and walk the distance between her car and her condo – sometimes close to a mile. Prior to losing her privileges, Ms. Frisch, who has a handicapped parking permit issued by the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, used a handicapped space close to her unit. (2)

According to Ms. Frisch, the change in her parking arrangements aggravated her medical condition. She wrote a letter to the Association asking for reinstatement of her parking rights. The Association denied the request, so Ms. Frisch filed a complaint with the Division on Civil Rights claiming the Association was discriminating against her by not accommodating her illness. (1)

The Association cited its by-laws as evidence that it acted within its rights to revoke Ms. Frisch’s privileges, including voting and membership rights, access to the tennis courts, swimming pool and parking lot, among other things. The Division, however, ruled the Association failed to show that Ms. Frisch’s request was unreasonable or that allowing her to use the parking lot would cause the Association undue hardship. (1)

In settlement of the complaint, the Association has agreed to, among other things, pay Ms. Frisch $7,528; pay her maintenance fees in the amount of $2,472 for the next year; forgive Ms. Frisch’s outstanding maintenance fees estimated at somewhere between $12,000 and $15,000; and pay $5,000 in costs to the Division on Civil Rights. Additionally, the Association will allow the Division to monitor any requests for accommodation it receives over the next two years and have certain of its officers participate in training sessions on the State’s Law Against Discrimination. (1)

The Division on Civil Rights is the State agency responsible for looking into complaints of discrimination specifically in the areas of public accommodation, employment and housing. (3)

(1) http://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases11/pr20110601a.html
(2) http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/state/mays-landing-condo-association-found-to-have-discriminated-against-disabled-woman
(3) http://www.state.nj.us/lps/dcr/about.html


Bookmark and Share

September 12, 2010

Leave Policies Must Be Flexible Enough to Accommodate Employees with Disabilities

Simply having leave policies in place is not enough to satisfy the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) if those policies are not flexible enough to “reasonably accommodate” employees with disabilities, contends the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

The EEOC filed suit against Princeton HealthCare System, a Mercer County, NJ company last month for failure to “reasonably accommodate” its employees with disabilities in regards to its leave policies, which is a violation of the ADA. (1)

The EEOC recognized that Princeton HealthCare does have leave policies for its employees as required under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) such as a 12-week leave. However, according to the suit, Princeton HealthCare does not approve extensions beyond the 12-week leave provided for under FMLA for its employees with disabilities. Per this lawsuit, Princeton HealthCare also has terminated employees with disabilities who did not qualify for leave under FMLA when they could not get back to work within the company’s seven-day deadline. (1)

ADA protects disabled workers on the federal level and requires companies to provide “reasonable accommodations” for their workers with disabilities unless those accommodations would pose undue hardships for the company. (2)

New Jersey State Law also makes it unlawful for a person to be harassed or discriminated against because of a disability. The New Jersey Anti-Discrimination Law protects people with mental and physical disabilities. Earlier this year, that Law was amended to include people with neurological disorders such as autism and other related disorders. (3) The Law mandates that people with disabilities have the right to seek jobs based on merit and that they are considered “qualified” as long as they can perform all the essential requirements for the job. It also provides that people with disabilities be eligible for the same opportunities and benefits as all other employees. Under both state and federal law, employers are required to make accommodations for employees with disabilities that would help them perform their jobs. Such accommodations could include, but are not limited to, modified schedules. (2)

This EEOC suit against Princeton HealthCare emphasizes that policies that are not flexible enough to accommodate all qualified employees, including those with disabilities are illegal under both federal and New Jersey State law.

(1) http://ohsonline.com/articles/2010/08/13/princeton-healthcare-sued.aspx?sc_lang=en

(2) http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/factsheets/fact_dis.pdf

(3) http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/01/nj_targets_autism_discriminati.html

Bookmark and Share